

Compare red vs. blue Google searches at http://hint.fm/seer/ (these pics of blue only, for legibility, but oh what a thrill to see the country come together over important questions such as Sarah Palin’s underwear). Via David Hoffman.


Compare red vs. blue Google searches at http://hint.fm/seer/ (these pics of blue only, for legibility, but oh what a thrill to see the country come together over important questions such as Sarah Palin’s underwear). Via David Hoffman.
The Times gins up some page views compares Michelle Obama’s and Sarah Palin’s style. In making the two women a focal point for the year, the piece veers from lists of peripherally related issues to what their choices seem to typify so that initially it’s hard to find a main idea other than: look! (Poor Cindy McCain. No style piece for you).
For some reason, both the Times and I think of Michelle by first name and Palin by last name (check the file names for the slide shows).
Both women look terrific. But as the article goes on, it decides that it feels antagonistic towards Michelle. Of her choices in labels it says:
[They] are all insider, apart from her shorts and those strategically worn plebe numbers from Target and Talbots. If she got any more insider, she’d be backing down a runway. She wears Rodarte, Jason Wu, Sophie Theallet, Narciso Rodriguez, Thakoon, Isabel Toledo and Rick Owens, labels that in terms of creativity and price are at the highest level of fashion. Go much higher and you hit couture.
Sly writing, relying on a winked shared assumption (insider=bad) without offering a rationale. There are the kind of ‘insider’ things that make no sense without a reference point (4chan jokes, for example), and there are the kind of ‘insider’ things that those on the outside may not know or care that they’re missing. And maybe Michelle likes to showcase up-and-coming designers. But no:
Read More
The Awl points out this from The Washington Independent, in which Sarah Palin seems be forecasting—or urging—the Apocalypse:
“I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don’t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.”
Tortured syntax, folksiness real or feigned, disregard of facts; liberals have been mocking and (some) conservatives have been defending Palin’s uniquely tongue-tied elocutions since her interview last fall with ABC’s Charles (“What part, Charlie”) Gibson.
But what happens when we put her words into Standard English? (new type in bold):
Read More
fiction
humor
language
lit/media crit
the writing life
music
photos
video
amherst
new york
new jersey
northampton
STORIES
Open City #28
Matchbook
wigleaf (2 forthcoming)
Writing Site
A Bright Wall
In A Dark Room
Being John Malkovich
Bell, Book and Candle
and The Lady Eve
The Bourne trilogy
A Month in the Country
Our Daily Bread
Rear Window
Sequels, Series,
Adaptations
and Reboots
Starship Troopers
Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf
Most-viewed posts
Anti-epiphanies
late Flannery
laughing at Downfall
fine restaurant, cookie jar
fav fiction of the 00s
the spine of the story
Renminbi vs Yuan
la Folia
reading Grace Paley
must-not see TV
Old favs
the Gawker decade
she chose a quiet street
another continent
fever to tell
deconstruction of the fable
the iceberg revisited
like fashion it's a passion
you look really good in skirts
use an emdash today
her corporate fridays